Googling
Try Bush and Google as combination:
http://www.newsnet5.com/technology/6246441/detail.html
Yes, Big Brother is watching, and he now wants to track your pornography habits! And I thought the UK was the only nanny state around!
Now don't get me wrong, I'm dead against child pornography, but if two consenting adults agree to exchange pictures/live web feeds in exchange for cash on the Internet, well it's nobody's business but their own. And as far as I am concerned, if they want Internet child protection, well its still the parents responsibilty to ensure their offspring do not spend too much time on the Net and only look at age relevant content.
And how will the quantity of pornography searches help child protection? You will not know whether children or adults were searching? And why do they need this to revive a failed law?
Maybe they are just trying to find out how many times the following sites were accessed (adult content, parental control advised):
http://www.milkandcookies.com/links/38764/
http://www.sanfords.net/George_Bush/George_Bush_funny_sayings_pictures.htm
http://www.lifeisajoke.com/flash17_html.htm
http://www.killsometime.com/video/video.asp?ID=57
http://www.thatsweird.net/funny_george_bush.shtml
http://www.holylemon.com/ConfusedBush.html
http://www.mosnews.com/news/2005/10/10/toiletpaper.shtml
Or maybe these on Bush and alcohol:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=33&num=5141
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news0102/president.html
http://tomflocco.com/fs/SecretServIntelSay.htm
Or the proud family history:
http://www.tarpley.net/bush2.htm
http://www.tupbiosystems.com/articles/bush_nazi.html
Sorry, just had to get those in, in case this is the week chosen, I am skewing the figures!
http://www.newsnet5.com/technology/6246441/detail.html
Yes, Big Brother is watching, and he now wants to track your pornography habits! And I thought the UK was the only nanny state around!
Now don't get me wrong, I'm dead against child pornography, but if two consenting adults agree to exchange pictures/live web feeds in exchange for cash on the Internet, well it's nobody's business but their own. And as far as I am concerned, if they want Internet child protection, well its still the parents responsibilty to ensure their offspring do not spend too much time on the Net and only look at age relevant content.
And how will the quantity of pornography searches help child protection? You will not know whether children or adults were searching? And why do they need this to revive a failed law?
Maybe they are just trying to find out how many times the following sites were accessed (adult content, parental control advised):
http://www.milkandcookies.com/links/38764/
http://www.sanfords.net/George_Bush/George_Bush_funny_sayings_pictures.htm
http://www.lifeisajoke.com/flash17_html.htm
http://www.killsometime.com/video/video.asp?ID=57
http://www.thatsweird.net/funny_george_bush.shtml
http://www.holylemon.com/ConfusedBush.html
http://www.mosnews.com/news/2005/10/10/toiletpaper.shtml
Or maybe these on Bush and alcohol:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=33&num=5141
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news0102/president.html
http://tomflocco.com/fs/SecretServIntelSay.htm
Or the proud family history:
http://www.tarpley.net/bush2.htm
http://www.tupbiosystems.com/articles/bush_nazi.html
Sorry, just had to get those in, in case this is the week chosen, I am skewing the figures!
1 Comment(s):
Reason number 5,637,157,382 we should be very afraid of the Bush government.
Things in Canada must be horrendous for them to want a Bush clone as their leader despite all exhibits one would think would dissuade a population from making such a mistake.
But again, that's a different blog entry topic for another day.
Post a Comment
All comments are welcome, however, rather than posting an Anonymous comment please consider selecting Other and providing your name or nickname so others know who you are. Thanks.