World View - A global perspective on our one world

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

The Ongoing Iraqi Civil War

The LA Times ran a story this weekend regarding the civil war in Iraq. The gist: they're already in one.

In a speech delivered as Iraqis prepared to go to the polls, President Bush said he didn't believe a civil war would break out in the country. But some observers believe it has already begun — a quiet and deadly struggle whose battle lines were thrown into sharp relief by the highly polarized vote results.

...

James Fearon, a Stanford University political scientist and an authority on modern conflicts, believes that Iraq's civil war began almost as soon as Hussein was ousted, and that it is now obscured and partly held back by the presence of foreign forces.

"I think there is definitely a civil war that has been going on since we finished the major combat operations," Fearon said. He rejects the position of many observers that a civil war is still only a possibility for Iraq.

"When people talk about 'Will there be a civil war?' they are really talking about a different type of civil war," he said.

The kind of war emerging in Iraq, characterized by guerrilla attacks, kidnappings, assassinations and "ethnic cleansing," is typical of modern civil conflicts, Fearon said.

"Since 1945, almost all civil wars, a big plurality, have been guerrilla wars where it is kind of insurgency versus counterinsurgency," he said. "Most civil wars look more like what we are seeing in Iraq now."
This is something I've been saying for a long time. When I first started my On The Road To 2008 blog in 2004, I wrote about the U.S.'s involvement in Iraq's civil war. Today matters only look far worse because the guerrilla tactics have not let up, and because of an increased sentiment that the political process is being held together by a thread.

I strongly recommend you read the entire article. Anyone who can convince me that George W. Bush knew what he was getting into when he invaded Iraq wins an award.

4 Comment(s):

Comment by: Blogger Daniel Kirkdorffer

I fear that you are right. Look at what happened in what was once Yugoslavia that broke up into Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slovenia, Serbia and Montenegro.

While this might please the Kurds the most, it leaves the Sunnis with little oil wealth, or a probable losing battle with better organized Kurds over oil fields in the north.

Meanwhile Iran would become the dominant military force in the region with only Israel to match them.

Can you spell disaster any more clearly than Bush has?

1/06/2006 4:08 PM UTC  
Comment by: Blogger olgalux

Wait a minute, if you break it up into 3 bits, then the Kurds in Turkey will start pushing harder and trying to join the Kurds in Iraq. That could lead to problems in Turkey, an EU state in waitng. And where that development lead to?

As to the rumours that the problem will be solved by Israel attacking Iran, those have been in the rumour mill for months now. It seems the most likely scenario as it avoids W having to start another war, instead he'll just go rescue an ally. But how would such a move be taken by the Arab states? After all Iran is not threatening Israel at all, merely saying it wants nuclear facilities, same as Israel has. So what pretext would they use to attack?

1/09/2006 1:34 PM UTC  
Comment by: Blogger Daniel Kirkdorffer

Once Pandora's box is opened shit happens. Yes, the Turkish Kurds will want their piece of the action. All the more reason to put pressure on the Iraqi Kurds to not fight for independence.

As for Israel being the U.S. puppet in an attack on Iran, while many suggest the possibility I'm inclined to believe the U.S. will attack Iran on their own without need for Israeli missiles.

I actually wrote about this a year ago this week at http://www.kirkdorffer.com/ontheroadto2008/2005/01/wargaming-iran.shtml

There is a good article from The Atlantic by James Fallows on the scenarios at http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/110904C.shtml

1/10/2006 6:37 AM UTC  
Comment by: Blogger Daniel Kirkdorffer

I wouldn't be so quick to let anyone be their own country. Too many conditions must apply. Not that the Kurds have a very good claim.

1/10/2006 4:21 PM UTC  

Post a Comment
All comments are welcome, however, rather than posting an Anonymous comment please consider selecting Other and providing your name or nickname so others know who you are. Thanks.

<< World View Home